After the Civil War and
the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, African Americans were technically
free from the bondage of slavery in the United States. Regardless, they faced a
long and arduous path to freedom, and would endure nearly another century of
oppression before becoming truly equal to whites. Though African Americans were
no longer able to be kept legally as slaves after the Civil War, white
Americans still considered them inferior. This is readily apparent when you
consider the way African Americans were portrayed in the majority of art
produced by artists after the Civil War. However, two artists stand in contrast
to that generalization. Thomas Eakins (1844-1916) and Winslow Homer (1836-1910)
both produced artworks with African Americans as the subject, and they
portrayed them in a notably more dignified and sensitive way than their
contemporaries. Both men, born in the north to families of modest, yet
comfortable means, lived to see the rise, climax, and fall of the Civil War in
the United States. They both saw the struggles that slavery, war, and eventual
freedom brought for African Americans. In their art, they both pay special
detail to things like clothing, facial expression, and posture. These details
allow them to subtly but effectively convey the sense of isolation that blacks
typically felt from society, as well as the heavy sorrow they felt. These were
a stark contrast to the portrayals of blacks by artists such as Joseph Decker (1853-1924)
or Thomas Hovenden (1840-1895). The piece by Decker that is featured in this
exhibition shows the clear relational tension between whites and blacks, while
Hovenden’s pieces create a false sense of contentment felt by blacks in the
United States.
Thomas Eakins. Portrait of a Black Woman (Negress).
1866-1869. Oil on Canvas. Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco.
Early in his career,
Eakins aspired to paint portraits. During the time this work was painted, he
was still training in Paris trying to attain that goal. The composition of Portrait of a Black Woman is stable. The
figure, who is a young black woman in the nude, occupies nearly the entire
canvas. The background of the painting is a caramel color that is just lighter
than her skin. She looks to the right of the canvas with downcast eyes. She
appears to be saddened by something, or perhaps deep in thought. This portrayal
of the sad emotions of a black woman show the sensitivity Eakins clearly felt
towards blacks after the Civil War. He also paints the woman as attractive in
appearance, which is unusual of any of Eakins’ contemporaries. Her
attractiveness indicates that Eakins must view African Americans in general
with more humanity than most of his contemporaries who did not paint attractive
black women.
Thomas Hovenden. I Know’d It Was Ripe. 1885. Oil on Canvas. Brooklyn Museum, 32.825
Thomas Hovenden was an
abolitionist and a man who greatly sympathized with African Americans. However,
many of his works portray blacks who are living in impoverished conditions, and
are happy and satisfied. This painting, featuring a black man who has just cut
into a large, ripe watermelon, does just that. The composition is stable in
much the same way as Portrait of a Black
Woman. The man is centered, and takes up the majority of the canvas. The
background is dark and barely contrasts with the man’s skin tone. He appears
relaxed, and is smiling directly at the viewer, while holding a half of his
melon. He is clearly living in very poor conditions, based on the background.
His white shirt is yellowing from age in several places, and all the furniture
in the room appears to be made of roughhewn wood. Regardless of his poor
surroundings, the man is the picture of happiness. For viewers during the late
1800’s, this would have planted the idea in their minds that African Americans
were content to live a simple existence, and did not need true equality or
opportunities for advancement as whites did.
Thomas Hovenden. Contentment. 1881. Oil on Canvas. The Columbus
Museum, G.1993.23
This painting, much like I Know’d It Was Ripe, also shows blacks
in poor surroundings, perfectly happy and content. In this painting, a heavyset
man sits comfortably in a rocking chair as a woman prepares a meal. It captures
a moment in which they are looking at each other and smiling in happiness. The
heavyset frame of the man clearly suggests that he has more than enough food, and
he is holding a pipe, which suggests there is either spare money for purchasing
such an item, or spare leisure time in which to make it. The woman is likewise
heavyset, and she is wearing a brightly colored headscarf. However, the house
of the couple is small and simple. The woman’s dress appears to be fraying at
the elbow, and the man’s vest is missing a button. Despite these details, the
painting feels as if a 19th century audience would view it almost as
an advertisement for the simple contentment that poverty can bring for African
Americans.
Winslow Homer. Dressing for the Carnival. 1877. Oil on Canvas. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 22.220
This painting by Homer
shows a man in a clown costume, with two women on either side making some final
adjustments to the outfit. Some children stand in a group in the background to
the right of the man, and a single child stands in the background towards the
left. Some of the children hold American flags. It is likely that this was a
real scene that Homer witnessed in Virginia on the 4th of July.
Since this depicts a man putting on a costume, presumably for a celebration of
some sort, the viewer would expect to see expressions of excitement on the
subject’s faces, particularly the children. However, quite the opposite is
true. All of the people in the scene seem somber and subdued. The viewer can
then infer that this celebration is not truly for them, but perhaps they are
just being made to take part in it for the enjoyment of an audience. The
clothes worn by the subjects also points to their situation. The children are
all wearing clothes that contain many patches, and thought the same is not true
for the adult’s clothes, they all look faded and worn. The nature of the clothing
worn by the people shows Homer’s sensitivity to the impoverished situation of
the African Americans, and the attention to the subtlety of their sober facial
expressions points to Homer’s sympathy towards the African Americans.
Joseph Decker. Our Gang. 1886. Oil on Canvas. Washington D.C.,
Collection of H. John Heinz III.
This painting features a
group of white boys who are surrounding a black boy. All the subjects are
clearly young children. The black boy, standing roughly center in the painting,
is the only one who is fully facing the viewer with his body, but his eyes are
looking nervously to the right of the painting where most of the white boys are
standing. He also stands with a noticeable stiffness. His hands are clenched at
his sides, and his shoulders are rigid. There is a nervous energy that seems to
run through his body, pointing to a “fight or flight” reaction that is about to
occur. The group of white boys all seem to be part of a “tough” crowd, despite
their young age. The way they are encircling the black boy, and the clear
anxiety of the black boy all seem to beg for the viewer’s sympathy. The
perspective of the painting, with the backs of many of the boys showing, makes
the viewer feel like an onlooker about to watch a fight break out, but you are
helpless to do anything. Our Gang
clearly depicts the racism that corrupts even the innocence of childhood,
because it is clear that the white boys have the power over the black boy in
this painting. It shows the ever-present racial tension that was felt
throughout society.
No comments:
Post a Comment