Artemisia Gentileschi is an intriguing figure
and I believe an unusual artist for the time she lived in. Gentileschi, a well-known
female artist, was a 17th century Baroque painter who lived in a time where
women were viewed as the weaker sex and who only existed for men and for their
consumption. 17th century Europe was dominated by male artists and their
portrayal of women usually reflected the view of the time. What was distinct
and unusual about Artemisia Gentileschi was that not only she was one of the few
female artists during that time period, she also portrayed women in very
different way than the male artists around her. In my curatorial exhibit you we
be able to clearly see this contrast between the way men portray women and how
Artemisia portrays women. While Artemisia portrays women as strong and clever
people who can achieve their own ends, the male artists in this exhibit over-sexualize women and portray them as weak. The uniqueness of Artemisia
Gentileschi’s portrayal of women can be seen in the exhibit’s center-piece: Esther Before Ahasuerus. At first glance
this seems to contradict the fact that Gentileschi stands out from the male
artists of the that because Esther seems weak, but as you read through my
analysis of this piece you will see that this is quite the opposite She is in
fact being portrayed as someone who is strong. The sharp contrast between theme
of strong women in Gentileschi’s paintings and theme of passive and
oversexualized women in the male artists’ paintings can be clearly seen as you
look through the exhibit.
Artemisia
Gentileschi, Esther Before Ahasuerus,date
unknown, oil on canvas, Accession Number: 69.281
Gentileschi’s
Esther Before Ahasuerus, is the
centerpiece of this exhibit and is a fine example of the strength Gentileschi
portrayed in women. Unlike Gentileschi’s male peers, who would choose to depict
women as fainting to portray female “weakness” ,Gentileschi chooses to depict
Esther as fainting or swooning in order to show Esther’s cleverness not weakness.
Esther, the woman in the mustard-colored dress, is fainting to achieve the goal
of having King Ahasuerus, the young man, do want what she wants him to do, not
because she is scared or weak. Though this piece is a more subtle portrayal of
strength because it displays Esther’s strength in her cleverness not in her
physical strength, it is still unique because it contrasts heavily from the
portrayal of weakness and passivity that can be in the women depicted by male
artist during that time.
Caravaggio, Judith Beheading Holofernes, 1599-1602, Nazionale d' Arte Antica
Though
Caravaggio’s painting is a depiction of a violent narrative, he chooses to
portray Judith, the young woman who is beheading Holofernes, as weak, though
you would expect her to be strong. One way that Caravaggio displays this
weakness is through Judith’s facial expression which communicates that is
unsure about what she is doing. The way she has distance herself from
Holofernes as much as she can, also communicates that she does not have
conviction. Caravaggio, through Judith’s lack of conviction, is communicating
that Judith is weak. Why would a narrative of a strong woman would be portrayed
as weak? Why would not look more like Gentileschi’s Judith Slaying Holofernes which depicts Judith as strong? The reason is that Caravaggio was
depicting women the way the culture at the time and probably him believed what
women by nature were like: weak.
Artemisia
Gentileschi, Judith Slaying Holofernes, c.
1614-20, oil on canvas, National Museum of Capodimonte
Gentileschi’s Judith Slaying Holofernes is a much more aggressive and violent
portrayal of the same narrative Caravaggio’s was depicting in his Judith Beheading Holofernes. The reason
for this is because Caravaggio is communicating that Judith, a woman, is weak
while Gentileschi is communicating that Judith is a violently strong woman. One
way Gentileschi communicates this strength is by having Judith forcefully
holding the head of Holofernes so he cannot escape from her beheading him,
unlike Caravaggio’s Judith who just grasps at Holofernes’ hair. Unlike
Caravaggio’s Judith who is does not have much conviction when beheading
Holofernes, Gentileschi’s Judith is using more of her body because she has more
conviction. All these differences demonstrate Gentileschi’s uniqueness in her
portrayal of women. The same narrative was portrayed in very different ways,
while Caravaggio was following in the steps of other male artists when
portraying women, Gentileschi stirred away from that and portrayed women as
strong.
Peter Paul Rubens, Leda
and the Swan, 1598-1602, Oil on wood, Fogg Art Museum
Unlike Gentileschi, Peter Paul Rubens portrays the female
body as something that is solely sexual. Rubens portrays this woman in the
painting as naked,not nude, by drawing attention to her sexuality, and not
dignifying and glorifying this woman’s body.
Rubens uses the swan that is lying on top of her to draw attention to
her sexual organs. Another way Ruben communicates that this woman is only
sexual is by having her passively lying down. By displaying the woman’s
sexuality this way he is communicating that this woman is only there for men’s
sexual consumption. This heavily contrast from Gentileschi’s paintings which
communicates that women are strong and clever and are much more than sexual
beings.
Artemisia Gentileschi ,Jael and
Sisera, 1620, oil on canvas, Museum of Fine Arts of Budapest
Like Judith Slaying
Holofernes, Jael and Sisera Gentileschi uses a violent narrative to portray
women as strong. Though no actually evidence of violence is seen in this piece
we know as viewers that something violent is about to happen. Gentileschi
displays strength in Jael the women about to kill Sisera (the man lying down),
by having her firmly grip the nail and the hammer. By having her do this
Gentileschi is communicating Jael having conviction in what she is doing. In
this conviction we can see Jael’s strength. Another way Gentileschi displays
strength is by having Jael using her whole body to kill Sisera. Again this communicates
strength and conviction. Unlike many male artists at this time who portrayed
women as passive, Gentileschi is portraying women as people who have the full
capacity to do something that requires much strength and conviction.
Nicolas Poussin, The Abduction of the Sabine Women, most likely 1633–34, oil on
canvas, Accession Number: 46.160
In
Poussin’s The Abduction of Sabine Women, the
Sabine women are being forcibly being taken by Roman soldiers. Poussin portrays
weakness in the Sabine women by having them not fighting back, unlike in the
Sabine men who are fighting back. One example of not fighting back is seen in
the woman in the blue dress on the left side of the painting. Though a Roman
soldier is holding on to her, she has her hands up instead using them to try to
escape from the Roman’s arms. Unlike Gentileschi’s women who use strength
physical or mental to achieve their ends, the women in Poussin’s painting are
barely do anything to escape the Romans who are trying to kidnap them. Like
many of the male artist at that time, Poussin depict women as weak and passive
people.
No comments:
Post a Comment