Friday, April 24, 2026

Omens of Death- Van Gogh’s Cypress Trees

 Omens of Death- Van Gogh’s Cypress Trees

Vincent Van Gogh is one of the world’s most well known artists. His work tends to appeal to a large 

audience, because he represents a modern obsession with neurodivergence and challenging the status 

quo. Van Gogh often painted natural scenes, and his work is divided into chronological sections based

 on his locations throughout life. Van Gogh is perhaps the most well documented artist of his time, 

if not all time, because his letters serve as resources for us to understand his perspective. This exhibition

 serves to explore his state of mind during the time he was in the asylum in Saint-Remy, and to explore

 Van Gogh’s premonition with death, leading up to his own death in 1890.  Can anything be said from 

looking at his works and writings from the time to confirm or deny the accepted explanations of his 

demise? The prevailing and accepted explanation is suicide, but certain evidences propose doubt

 on the answer that the man himself wanted us to pick. Why would a man who wanted to die drag 

himself back to society after a self inflicted wound, and seek help? Van Gogh was not one who would

 attempt suicide for attention and fail on purpose. As you explore his works, you may see that the man

 himself was not in such a state to do this. How does the series of paintings relate to Van Gogh’s death,

 if at all, and do they give any credibility to either interpretation of his death?

 
Vincent van Gogh
Self-Portrait with Straw Hat
Summer 1887
Oil on canvas
40.6 × 31.8 cm
The Metropolitan Museum of Art

 

 One of Van Gogh's self portraits, painted in 1887, allows the viewer to acquaint themselves

with the subject of our scrutiny, and his painting style. He paints in large brushstrokes, separating

the subject into distinct areas of colour, portraying the idea of the subject, but more importantly,

an emotion, and an idea beyond the physical. Observe how he paints himself, consider it. Create

a supposition that will either be confirmed or denied by his other works. 

 

 Vincent van Gogh
The Starry Night
June 1889
Oil on canvas
73.7 × 92.1 cm (29 × 36 1/4 in.)
Lillie P. Bliss Bequest
Accession no. 472.1941
Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), New York 

 

 This is undoubtedly Van Gogh's most famous work. Painted after the main subject of exhibition, 

but important for the viewer to reacquaint themselves with their former experiences- to remind 

them of the culture that has been created. A swirling sky, on fire with light: the beautiful creation

of an injured mind, or the reinterpretation through a more inventive lens? Let the viewer choose his 

own reading. 

 

 Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853–1890)
Cypresses
1889
Oil on canvas
93.4 × 74 cm (36 3/4 × 29 1/8 in.)
Rogers Fund, 1949
Accession no. 49.30
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
(On view, Gallery 825)

 

    "Cypresses" shows two tall trees, like "grand obelisks" as the painter himself described them. Cypress trees are sometimes considered a symbol of death, and Van Gogh himself compares them to another symbol of mortality: the Egyptian obelisk that would have marked a tomb. He painted multiple works containing the trees as a center focus- a premonition, a fear, or even a message? He never explicitly says, but his letters from the time show him in a seemingly good humour, and a better one than before he entered the asylum. 

Vincent van Gogh
Road with Cypress and Star
February 1890
Oil on canvas

43.5 cm x 27.2 cm
Van Gogh Museum

 

 

 This is another example, painted in the same time frame. The row of cypress trees, over a similar 

background, dominating the landscape. The swirling brushstrokes that do not accurately represent 

each leaf, but instead represent what the leaves do as a whole. Leaving the bright scene dominated

by the dark values of the trees, it is intentionally contrasting light and dark- life and death. The 

foliage is bright, the sky is saturated and welcoming like a summers day, but still the trees cut the

landscape and tower to the heavens. 

Vincent van Gogh
Wheat Field with Cypresses
September 1889
Oil on canvas
72.4 × 91.4 cm (28 1/2 × 36 in.)
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
New York
Accession no. 1993.132
(On view, usually Gallery 825)



 We recognize the same two trees and the same mountainous background, from a new angle,

as "Cypresses". This time, we also see a wheat field, another common subject from Van Gogh. 

The pyramid of the painting draws the eyes up the trees, to the heavens, and elicits again

the ideas of mortality, death, and the beyond. The sky fills nearly half the canvas, and puts

contrast between the reminders of mortality below and the hope above. 

 

 Vincent van Gogh
Wheatfield with Crows
July 1890
Oil on canvas
50.2 × 103 cm (19 3/4 × 40 1/2 in.)
Van Gogh Museum
Amsterdam

    

 

Van Goghs last work, another wheat field, is melancholy, but also seems to be representational. 

Perhaps we imagine the crows scattering from the gunshot, or as omens of death themselves, or

as simply a common sight above a wheat field. This painting especially reminds us of how our

per-conceptions influence our interpretation of art, and how this feedback loop further ingrains

our own idea into the mind. If Van Gogh killed himself, then we read the painting as his suicide 

note, one last statement about the world, and how it failed him, but his art was an escape. An 

escape that also was not enough. Suicide never happens without strong reason, and Van Gogh

wanted to get better. He felt as if he was getting better. The dark sky makes one see a dark thought

entering, but what if it was simply a raincloud? Can anyone truly say the truth, about something

they did not witness, when one interpretation serves their own ideas, the way they want to see the

artist?     

 

 

 

 

A Loving Eye: Sublimity in Landscapes

Writing in 1757, Edmund Burke defines the sublime as an experience of awe and terror, placing nature as something that overwhelms and threatens. This was the  approach of several artists like Frederic Church and Albert Bierstadt as they painted daunting landscapes, diminishing the viewer. However, looking purposefully at the featured artists challenges this concept. These landscapes are not a source of terror, but of solace. Unlike the daunting Andes of Frederic Church, these views are a place of refuge and belonging.

The artists featured saw their landscapes not as terrifying, but as restorative. These paintings by Gifford, Cole, Homer, Constable, Cézanne, and O’Keeffe portray the landscapes as peaceful rather than threatening. They represent home. Nature is not something that terrifies, but something that soothes and holds. Thomas Cole remarks that he often looks upon the Catskills with a loving eye, not a fearful one. 

The sublime, as these artists experience it, is not in the object of nature, but in the relationship between the artist and the landscape, built through repetition and return. Sanford Robinson Gifford returned to the same gorge for nearly twenty years finding refuge in it, even from his time in the Civil War. Paul Cézanne painted views of Monte Sainte-Victoire over eighty times. Georgia O’Keeffe felt not only a sense of belonging in her New Mexico cliffs, but a feeling of ownership. This behavior mirrors what Yi-Fu Tuan called “Topophilia,” the notion that people have deep affectionate bonds with the environment. This exhibition traces not the terror of sublimity, but the solace that these artists feel.

 

A Gorge in the Mountains(Kauterskill Clove)

Sanford Robinson Gifford, 1862

Oil on canvas, 48 x 39 ⅞ in.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 15.30.62

This warm composition is the first in a series of many that Gifford paints of Kauterskill Clove until he dies nearly twenty years later. Gifford illuminates a scenic view over a river gorge landscape, unified by a neutralizing yellow hue across the tall, forty-eight by nearly forty inch canvas. This painting exemplifies Luminism, a nineteenth century American style characterized by hazy, glowing uses of light, often conveying a spiritual reality. According to Barbara Novak, this use of light reflects a new type of relationship with the landscape than the earlier Hudson River School. Here, Gifford unifies the work with this luministic warmth, making the landscape’s sublimity restorative rather than terrifying. The landscape painter was said to have loved these mountains as he loved his mother, and he visited them just as often. This is a window into a more Romantic sublime, with its luminous quality instilling peace. Clearly Gifford’s relationship with this landscape reflected his love for it, not his fear of it. 


View on the Catskills — Early Autumn

Thomas Cole, 1836-37

Oil on canvas, 39 x 63 in.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 95.13.3

While Thomas Cole is often attributed to the terror side of the sublime, that is not always the case. Here, Cole paints a soft and tranquil landscape just miles from Kauterskill Clove. This view of the Catskill Creek area was one frequently visited by the famous landscape painter until he became a resident of the community. Cole increases the level of drama in the Romantic sublime and depicts humanity in a way that makes this work feel more like home than Gifford’s gorge. Threatened by the growth of the railroad, Cole lamented the destruction of his “favorite haunt” as the foliage was disrupted for the Catskill Railroad construction. This term shows the depth of Cole’s feelings for the area, which he said that he looked upon often with a loving eye. The scene is vibrant, yet serene. Cole paints this before the solace is interrupted by the railroad, showing the peacefulness of the natural landscape. 


Northeaster

Winslow Homer, 1895; reworked by 1901

Oil on canvas, 34 1/2 x 50 in

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 10.64.5

While Winslow Homer’s Northeaster depicts strong crashing waves, this still represents more of the concept of solace than terror. Homer paints this scene on the coast of Maine, where he escaped from the busyness of New York. Originally, the artists included two human figures crouching on the rocks, but he replaced them with crashing waves. This is where Kant’s comments on the sublime are helpful. He asserts that the sublime is not in the object of nature, but in the relationship between the artist and the landscape. On this coast, even the crashing waves and the inherent roaring of the sea present solace in the sublime through the artist’s relationship with the landscape. While seemingly opposites, both Gifford’s golden haze and Homer’s powerful waves display the sublime as a space for refuge. 


Hampstead Heath with Bathers

John Constable, 1821-22

Oil on canvas, 9 ⅝ x 15 ⅜ in

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2009.400.26

This feeling of solace in nature wasn’t distinctly American. Across the Atlantic, John Constable escapes to this landscape in Hampstead from London’s intense summer heat and polluted air. At this homestead, Constable’s wife, Maria, could live in cleaner air to help treat her tuberculosis. This place frees Constable and his family from the heat and effects of the city. The sublime shows itself through the soft clouds and the grandeur of the peaceful atmosphere. This is just one of about one hundred sketches that Constable did here, showing his lasting relationship with the landscape. It is in reference to this place that Constable is often quoted in saying that he should “paint [his] own places best. Painting is just another word for feeling.” It is clear that John Constable feels a sense of ownership over this place and finds a feeling of solace in this landscape.  


Mont Sainte-Victoire

Paul Cézanne, ca. 1902-6

Oil on canvas, 22 ½ x 38 ¼ in.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1994.420

Paul Cézanne sketches the Mont Sainte-Victoire around eighty times over more than thirty years. This particular impressionist painting shows a more intimate relationship between the artist and the landscape, showing the depth of his knowledge of the terrain. Not only does Cézanne form a relationship through repetition, but the Mont Sainte-Victoire has a spiritual connection as well. Cézanne’s fascination stems partly from the ancient idea of this as a holy mountain where gods were born and resided. But for Cézanne, it was an inner god shown through the peak, a striving and desire for repose. The sublimity of this landscape reflects a solace in relationship and rest in this place. Cézanne polishes this painting for years before he is finished, reflecting a deeper connection to the environment.  


                

Red and Yellow Cliffs

Georgia O’Keeffe, 1940

Oil on canvas, 24 × 36 in. 

The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1987.377.4

Georgia O’Keeffe paints these cliffs at Ghost Ranch in New Mexico where she bought a house. When she first sees these vibrant cliffs she claims them to be her own. These cliffs of the American Southwest are to Georgia O’Keeffe, as the Mont Sainte-Victoire and Kauterskill Clove are to Cézanne and Gifford. The modern artist paints her cliffs seven times, continuing the narrative of relationship between the artist and the landscape. Like Winslow Homer, this home in New Mexico is a product of her escape from the effects of New York. These immense cliffs — set into scale by the pocket of blue sky in the upper left corner — show sublimity as solace. O’Keeffe sees these cliffs as a place of belonging and rest from the pressures of the world. Her relationship is territorial and intimate as these cliffs are the only place where she can breathe naturally and feel at home.



References

Avery, Kevin J., and Franklin Kelly, eds. Hudson River School Visions: The Landscapes of Sanford R. Gifford. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2003.

Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. London: R. and J. Dodsley, 1757.

Cézanne, Paul. Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Viaduct of the Arc River Valley. 1882–85. Oil on canvas, 25 3/4 × 32 1/8 in. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, Bequest of Mrs. H. O. Havemeyer, 1929. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/435877

Cole, Thomas. "Essay on American Scenery." American Monthly Magazine 1 (January 1836): 1–12.

Cole, Thomas. View on the Catskill—Early Autumn. 1836–37. Oil on canvas, 39 × 63 in. Gift in memory of Jonathan Sturges by his children, 1895. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/10501

Gifford, Sanford Robinson. A Gorge in the Mountains (Kauterskill Clove). 1862. Oil on canvas, 48 × 39 7/8 in. Bequest of Maria DeWitt Jesup, from the collection of her husband, Morris K. Jesup, 1914. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/10946

Homer, Winslow. Northeaster. 1895, reworked by 1901. Oil on canvas, 34 1/2 × 50 in. Gift of George A. Hearn, 1910. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/11130

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987. First published 1790.

Novak, Barbara. "Luminism: An Alternative Tradition." In American Painting of the Nineteenth Century. New York: Praeger, 1969.

O'Keeffe, Georgia. Red and Yellow Cliffs. 1940. Oil on canvas, 24 × 36 in. Alfred Stieglitz Collection, Bequest of Georgia O'Keeffe, 1986. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/484833

Phillips Collection. "Mont Sainte-Victoire." Accessed April 23, 2026. https://www.phillipscollection.org/collection/mont-sainte-victoire.