Seurat’s final edition from Study For A Sunday on La Grande Jatte was not well received by the
Parisian art community in its debut in 1886. His work stood out in stark
contrast to his contemporary impressionist and representationalist associates.
What made his work so revolutionary—aside from his near scientific method of
painting, an application of individual points of color in near ascetic effort
with an eye to form and complementary colors—was how he broke with the standing
tradition of having clearly demarked relationships between the figures in his
paintings. Whereas his contemporaries painted to model social mores—depicting
the hard laborer, the virtuous Madonna—Seurat composed his piece without any
such commentary, leaving his viewers unsure exactly how the people in his
painting related to one another. Critics of his time were confused as to his
intent in making the painting and viewed it as retrograde at best, an assault
upon art at worst. Of course, time has since vindicated Seurat, and this
exhibition is centered around his theme: art that challenges the status quo. This
show contains pieces from America, France, and Japan all from the 1800s to give
a more global sense of what was emerging at the time.
Edgar Degas, Woman Bathing in a Shallow Tub, 1885, Charcoal and pastel on light green wove paper, now discolored to warm
gray, laid down on silk bolting, 29.100.41
Edgar Degas was a frequent
challenger of the Paris art scene. In 1885 he finished Woman Bathing in a Shallow Tub and was promptly received with
bashing from the established art critics for the ‘compromising’ and ‘ungainly’
positions his models often occupied. His work takes a shot at Parisian double
standard of portraying women—nudity under the guise of divinity was acceptable,
but an ordinary woman in ordinary environs was considered low and off limits.
Katsushika Hokusai, Under the Wave off Kanagawa (Kanagawa oki nami ura), also known as The Great Wave, from the series Thirty-six Views of Mount Fuji (Fugaku sanjūrokkei), 1830–32, Polychrome woodblock print; ink and color on
paper, JP1847
Around the same time as Degas and
Seurat, Katsushika Hokusai of Edo/Tokyo was marching to a much different
drummer. His famous print Under the Wave
off Kanagawa (1830) crossed his native culture in how it was deeply
influenced by Dutch printmaking style. From his use of Prussian blue to his
adoption of Dutch linear perspective, Hokusai stood in stark contrast to
preceding generations of Japanese artists—who had been tightly constrained
under anti-western trade laws which also constrained art collaboration—by how
heavily he borrowed from western tradition.
Timothy H. O'Sullivan, Field Where General Reynolds Fell, 1863, Albumen silver print from glass negative, 2005.100.502.1 (37)
Meanwhile, Timothy O’Sullivan was
embroiled in the US Civil War. Not as a soldier, but as a wartime photographer.
During the 1800’s, photography was viewed primarily as a documentary exercise,
and was often propagandic in nature. O’Sullivan broke with the established
practice of the time with Field Where
General Reynolds Fell (1863) and emphasized the more gruesome side of the
civil war. He focused on the bloated bodies rather than polished military
parades, paving the way for modern artists by emphasizing the executive
decision of the photographer as inherently art-worthy.
Paul Cézanne, Gardanne, 1885–86, Oil on canvas, 57.181
Also in France, Cezanne was working
on Gardane (1885). Known by many as
the father of post-impressionism and a forerunner of cubism, Cezanne inspired
such notable persons as Picasso and Henri Matisse. Contrary to the overriding
impulse of the impressionists to capture a momentary ‘impression’ of the
subject matter, Cezanne labored to create simple forms and color planes. His
work laid the ground for cubism in the future with its highly geometric and
angular design.
Georges Seurat, A Sunday on La Grande Jatte, 1884/86, Oil on canvas, (Chicago Art Institute), 1926.224
Georges Seurat, A Study for A Sunday on La Grande Jatte, 1884, Oil on wood, 1975.1.207
Finally, we come full circle to the
finished piece of Sunday on La Grande
Jatte (1886), and its predecessor, Study for Sunday on La Grande Jatte. When it was displayed in the salon it drew harsh criticism
for its lack of clearly distinguished relationships between the figures in the
painting. Some thought it was a throwback to Egyptian or Greek art with its
regal, processionlike nature. Those who understood Seurat best knew the
painting was primarily an exercise in establishing his new method of
Pointilism, focusing on the careful application of color with form, light, and
contrast in mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment